02 / Document intelligence / controlled actions

AI document review with human control

A document-review workflow that prepares recommendations while people remain responsible for approving changes.

The recurring problem

Start with
the actual work.

Reviewing a policy library means finding relevant material, considering changes, preserving originals and recording decisions. Those stages need to remain connected when AI helps prepare recommendations.

The implementation contribution

Implementation work connected document intake and extraction, AI-generated review recommendations, a review queue and application-controlled changes. The design separates the model's review from the application's ability to write an approved change.

Implemented behaviour

What the work contains.

01Document intake and extraction, with warnings for files that cannot be read.
02Structured recommendations and a human approval queue.
03An original-file backup before an approved change is applied.
04Document-version checks and an audit trail for decisions and changes.

Explore the workflow

A recommendation needs a decision.

A reconstructed example using invented inputs. The original client system is not exposed.

Reconstructed example / invented document

Human review enabled

Operating procedure / section 4

Review intervals

Review this procedure every twenty-four months.

Synthetic document · Version 1

Recommendation

Prepare a proposed change, then decide whether to apply it.

Source: invented review brief, paragraph 2. This example is not regulatory guidance.

No change has been prepared.

Local simulation only. No live AI, real policy, client document or external write is involved.

Watch the edited walkthrough

Captured from the reconstructed example above. Edited playback with invented inputs; no live client system, build timing or measured outcome is shown. The controls above provide the same workflow in text.

Evidence

What supports this account.

The implementation contains explicit approval checks, backup handling, change application and audit records. Tests cover several of those behaviours. The example below reconstructs the workflow with invented documents.

Limits

What remains unmeasured.

This page does not establish current live deployment status, a measured reduction in review time or regulatory compliance. Source documents and professional decisions still need human review.

The practical lesson

Separate preparing a recommendation from permission to change the system of record.

Discuss a similar workflow ↗

Your next workflow

Let’s put the
week to work.

Tell us what your team does repeatedly. We’ll discuss the opportunity, your tools and whether an implementation week is a useful first step.

Pricing follows discovery. We aim to reply within one business day.